LOST

Your results:
You are Boone Carlyle

Boone Carlyle 80% Michael Dawson 60% Sun Kwon 60% Hugo "Hurley" Reyes 53% Sayid Jarrah 50% John Locke 50% Dr. Jack Shephard 48% Claire Littleton 48% Mr. Eko 45% Charlie Pace 44% Walt Lloyd 40% Shannon Rutherford 36% Jin-Soo Kwon 35% Kate Austen 30% Ana-Lucia Cortez 24% James "Sawyer" Ford 22%

You are a wealthy and good-looking person who tries to keep your friends and loved ones out of trouble.

Click here to take the Lost Personality Quiz

Scenes From "The West Wing"

Meghan McCain: "I Believe in Gay Marriage"

With the retirement of Chuck Hagel and the long-ago deaths of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln, Meghan McCain (yes, daughter of John) is quickly becoming my favorite Republican.

Here's a little snippet of Ms. McCain's interview with Larry King last night:

McCain: I consider myself a progressive Republican. I am liberal on social issues. And I think that the party is at a place where social issues shouldn't be the issues that define the party. And I have taken heat, but in fairness to me, I am a different generation than the people that are giving me heat. I'm 24 years old. I'm not in my 40s, I'm not in my 50s and older.

King: Therefore, you must, based on what you said, disagree with your father? ... Do you discuss it?

McCain: We have a very big generation gap between me and my father. Yes, we discuss them. He's very open-minded. I was raised in an open-minded home. I was raised a Christian, but I was raised open-minded Christian -- one to accept people, love people, not pass judgment. ...

I believe in gay marriage. ... I personally am pro-life, but I'm not going to judge someone that's pro-choice. It is not my place to judge other people and what they do with their body.

I couldn't have said it any better myself. See, one thing about the difference between Democrats and Republicans is that no reasonable person could ever seriously accuse the Democrats of stifling dissent; the Party is infamous for being historically disjointed and disagreeable. One recalls Will Rogers' famous quote "I'm not a member of an organized political party; I'm a Democrat."

The Republicans, on the other hand, have - at least in modern times - become a party of Yes Men that stifles any kind of dissent amongst its minority ranks. The result is that the party's standard-bearers have to adhere by very strict, sometimes ridiculous guidelines and positions (all in the name of "pleasing the base"). Just a few weeks ago, Michael Steele learned this the hard way when he went against Rush Limbaugh; not only did Steele had to retract his (sane) comments, but all the other GOP big shots then totally backed off of anything that could be perceived as remotely critical of what Limbaugh thought.

Anyway, to hear Meghan McCain promote a debate within the GOP - and to hear her declare her support for gay marriage (!) - is a breath of beautifully fresh air. She is correct in her assessment that the Republicans are not going to get anywhere by not changing anything. She should also be commended for her position that, while she personally is pro-life, she's not going to tell other women what they can or cannot do with their bodies. I believe Meghan's position on abortion to be very near the median position in the country: a personal pro-lifer comfortable living in a pro-choice nation. In other words, "I certainly won't be getting an abortion, but there's no need to ban it from everyone."

As I've said before, the GOP would do itself a lot of good to get off its "moral" high horse, start seriously looking inward at themselves and eventually figure out a way to join the healthy debate of reasonable people. We're all waiting for them. They can start by listening to Meghan McCain.

My NCAA WACK-et

I'm watching the first batch of games of the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, and I already have a queasy feeling.

Not a good sign.

For the record, I have North Carolina, Louisville, Pittsburgh and Memphis in the Final Four, with North Carolina beating Louisville in the championship game. Who else has this exact scenario? Why, President Barack Obama, of course.

Unlike the President, however, I will not be attending the NATO Summit the evening of the championship. I guess the comparisons only run so far.

Scenes From "The West Wing"

The fiasco over LemonLyman.com:

WTF is Jindal Talking About?

"Don't let anyone tell you we can't" overcome our challenges, is the jist of what Bobby Jindal is now saying his "rebuttal" to Obama's speech.

Um, hello? He does know that he's responding to the Hope President, right? Since when has Obama ever even remotely hinted that America "can't" overcome this crisis?!?

God, the Republicans are so out of touch it's insane.

UPDATE: "If it sounds like Jindal is targeting his speech to a room full of fourth graders, that's because he is. They might be the next people to actually vote for Republicans again." -Nate Silver.

Jindal's Rebuttal

Bobby Jindal strikes me as weirdly over-the-top.

Does he know how ridiculous he sounds? Is he drunk?

Thoughts on the Non-State of the Union State of the Union

What has always struck me about President Obama is that, regardless of the circumstances, he seems like he is the adult in the room. Whereas Bush was the drunk uncle at your cousin's wedding who was hogging the microphone for far too long, Obama is an almost grandfatherly figure - the elder statesman, the bridge-builder, the wise man (not a wise guy, like Bush). He is a leader capable of both sobriety and inspiration.

Tonight's address was classic Obama: a mix of cautious conservatism and some pretty lofty (liberal) goals. He is right in that, as we find ourselves in the midst of this great economic crisis, NOW is the time to tackle the problems that have dogged us for too long: health care and energy being chief among them. Our health care "system" - if you can call it that - and our importation of foreign oil is short-shrifting our citizens, poisoning our planet and putting a burden on our economy. Now is the time to tackle these problems, not shy away from them.

At 9:00 tonight, before the President's address, I found myself in my customarily pessimistic position as I reflected on the sorry state of our national economy and conscience. But as he has so many times, Obama somehow has managed to turn my frown upside down, and reframe this moment as a possibility for rebuilding and renewal, as opposed to a complete meltdown of the world as we know it. The job before him - and us - is extraordinarily difficult, if not mostly impossible, and none of what the President outlined tonight will be easy. But I have been reminded once again of the importance of having faith that we will get there. We will get there. And we will be better off when we do.

Bonnie & WHYde?

NOTE: You are not dreaming. What I am about to write is totally, completely, 100% accurate.

Hillary Duff will star in the new indie feature The Story of Bonnie and Clyde, an adaptation of the tale that was made into the 1967 classic - and Danifesto favorite - Bonnie and Clyde.

In response to this, Faye Dunaway (who played Bonnie in the original) said, "Couldn't they have at least cast a real actress?" And then in response to THAT, Hillary Duff had the nerve to insult Faye Dunaway's looks!

I think Faye looks pretty good for 68. And she certainly looked fabulous in 1967. Of course, HillDuff wouldn't know anything about that.

The question here, though, is: WHY? WHY WOULD ANYONE EVER MAKE THIS?????

Though this movie is apparently not officially a "remake," everyone will compare it with the original. Why on earth do people bother to remake, or "update," classics? Nobody wants to see a new version of a classic (see: Psycho, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, etc.). This is just asking for trouble.

Who's gonna play Gene Hackman's role? One of the Jonas Brothers?

MSNBC Needlessly Stirring the Sexism Pot

Earlier this morning, Norah O'Donnell and MSNBC White House correspondent Savannah Guthrie opined that Nancy Killefer, who was withdrawing her nomination to be performance director at the Office of Management and Budget, faced a double standard because she was a woman.

O'Donnell mused that Killefer, who failed to pay about $1,000 in taxes, was being forced to withdraw because of her gender, while Tim Geithner and Tom Daschle, two other Obama nominees who also had failed to pay taxes, got to stay because they were men.

Now that Tom Daschle has withdrawn his nomination, O'Donnell's remarks seem even more ridiculous than they were when she first made them, even though they were pretty silly even then. Killefer withdrew her candidacy not because she was a woman, but because she was the THIRD Obama nominee who had failed to pay taxes! Had Killefer been the first presidential nominee whose tax problems had become public, she probably would have made it through. But this was about timing, not sexism. Three strikes and you're out, as they say.

Norah O'Donnell and Savannah Guthrie should know better than to cry sexism - which is a foul and reprehensible thing - when no such misbehavior exists, at least in this case.